Annex F. M&E: Framework – Project Rubric
Criteria/Grade: Completeness (15%)
0-2.9
Non-existent / Very Poor
Very few or even none of the results chain components are described. There is no data quality assessment of the indicators.
3-4.9
Unsatisfactory / Poor
Only some elements of the results chain are described. There is no data quality assessment of the indicators.
5-6.9
Good
All but a few minor elements of the results chain are described. Data quality is assessed for at least one outcome indicator, or for two non-outcome indicators.
7-8.9
Very Good
All the elements of the results chain are described. Data quality is assessed for one outcome indicator, or for two non-outcome indicators.
9-10
Excellent
All the elements of the results chain are fully described. Data quality is assessed for at least two indicators, one of which is an outcome indicator.
Criteria/Grade: Structure and Consistency (35%)
0-2.9
Non-existent / Very Poor
The M&E Framework has fewer than 40% of it's elements in their logical order. The descriptions of the components are not aligned with each other at all.
3-4.9
Unsatisfactory / Poor
The M&E Framework has fewer than 60% of its elements in their logical order. The descriptions of the components are poorly aligned with each other.
5-6.9
Good
The M&E Framework includes at least 60% of its elements in their logical order. The descriptions of the components are generally aligned with each other, with only some minor inconsistencies.
7-8.9
Very Good
The M&E Framework includes at least 80% of its elements in their logical order. The descriptions of the components are mostly aligned with each other.
9-10
Excellent
The M&E Framework includes all elements in their logical order. The descriptions of the components are perfectly aligned with each other.
Criteria/Grade: Accuracy (35%)
0-2.9
Non-existent / Very Poor
Very few or none of the components of the M&E Framework are formulated according to the definition of each element of the results chain and the data quality assessment items.
3-4.9
Unsatisfactory / Poor
Less than a half of the components of the M&E Framework are formulated according to the definition of each element of the results chain and the data quality assessment items.
5-6.9
Good
Only between one-half and two-thirds of the components of the M&E Framework are formulated according to the definition of each element of the results chain and the data quality assessment items.
7-8.9
Very Good
All but few components of the M&E Framework are formulated in close accordance with the definition of each element of the results chain and the data quality assessment items.
9-10
Excellent
All components of the M&E Framework are formulated in close accordance with the definition of each element of the results chain and the data quality assessment items.
Criteria/Grade: Correctness & Clarity (15%)
0-2.9
Non-existent / Very Poor
The text is full of grammar and spelling mistakes. It is misleading, inconsistent and / or unintelligible.
3-4.9
Unsatisfactory / Poor
The text is not fully clear. Grammar and spelling mistakes make it difficult to read interpret.
5-6.9
Good
The text is correct with only a few minor grammar or spelling mistakes. The descriptions are clear and reading smooth.
7-8.9
Very Good
The text is correct with no grammar or spelling mistakes. Sentences are well constructed, arguments clear, and reading is fluid.
9-10
Excellent
Grammar is impeccable. The text uses a rich and appropriate vocabulary, describing the elements in an appropriate way. Reading is both pleasant and informative.
